The management of financial resources observed shushing, starts with the identification of the financial needs of the local government, and to be followed with the development of strategies for acquiring them, allocating them such that they confer maximum benefits to the community as a whole, ensuring their judicious and most fungal usage, insisting on adequate recording of the transactions and events arising from such usage1. Rendering accountability for the actions of these put in position of responsibility as well as the local government as a corporate body in the form required by law and convention2. This research work seeks to review the role of revenue collection strategies in the reformed local government. For an institution to sustain and justify its routines existence, it is a sine qua none that its sources of revenue must be certain and its expenditure cut down within its resources and finally its general administration guided with utmost produce.
One of the most important but often underrated of these details is the limitations section of your manuscript. Many authors often experience difficulty writing about the limitations of their work or are reluctant to include them at all.
However, to ensure that you provide accurate context for your work and give readers sufficient information to properly evaluate the relevance and impact of your results, they must be included. Types of Limitations Before you even start your study, you may be aware that there are certain limitations to what you want to test or what possible results may come of your efforts.
The procedures you have available or specific constraints on the study population may ultimately affect what outcomes you can obtain. These we can refer to as study design limitations.
Another type of limitation to consider is what we might call an impact limitation. Even if your study has strong design and excellent statistics, it can suffer from limited impact from factors such as a strong regional focus, being too population-specific, or the field being only conducive to incremental findings.
A final type of limitation is that of statistical or data limitations. Sometimes you may not be able to collect as much or as good data as you intended, or perhaps enrollment was more difficult than expected, underpowering your results.
Statistical limitations can also stem from study design, producing more serious limitations in terms of interpreting the findings. How to Describe Your Limitations Now that you know how to identify possible limitations in your study, the question turns to how to go about describing them in your article.
Your study looked at the efficacy of a new diabetes treatment in Japanese patients. The results were very positive; however, because you only looked at Japanese patients, these findings may not translate to patients of other ethnicities. A statement to this effect could be declared in the limitations section of your manuscript, followed up by a comment about how the results might still be widely applicable as they will help with patient-specific treatment in all parts of the world.
When breaking new ground, it is likely that there are still a lot of gaps in the knowledge base that need to be filled.
Therefore, a good follow-up statement for this type of limitation is to describe what, based on these results, the next steps would be to build a stronger overall evidence base. Now, it is possible that your study will have a fairly critical flaw usually in the study design that decreases confidence in your findings.
You can still explain why the study is worth repeating or how you plan to re-test the phenomenon, but it is also likely that your publication goals may need to be lowered if you still plan to publish your work. Our knowledge base is built on uncovering each piece of the puzzle, one at a time, and limitations show us where new efforts need to be made.
This will allow you to improve the content based on advice and recommendations from an experienced expert and will minimize the need for revisions after submission.Short presentation on the difference between delimitations, limitations, and assumptions.
Short presentation on the difference between delimitations, limitations, and assumptions Chapter 1 of a research paper Isabelle Gonzaga. Research usually limited in scope by sample size, time and geographic area. While the delimitation of study is the description of the scope of study.
It will explain why definite aspects of a subject were chosen and why others were excluded. Scope and limitations of the study pdf Objectives, Scope and Limitations of the Research. scope and limitations of the study in research paper srmvision.com and Delimitation of the Study.
The conduct of analysis is limited to the available and consistent data on macro- economic and monetary indicators from. Scope and Limitations of Surface. The limitations of the study are those characteristics of design or methodology that impacted or influenced the interpretation of the findings from your research.
They are the constraints on generalizability, applications to practice, and/or utility of findings that are the result of the ways in. Scope And Delimitations Of Absentee Essays and Term Papers Search Results for 'scope and delimitations of absentee' Table Of Contetnts Title Page Table Of Contents Chapter 1: Problem And Its Background Introduction Statement Of The Problem.
The commission has formed, for this purpose, six delimitation committees - one for each province, one for the federal capital, and one for the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).